For PE-backed portfolio companies
You Were Told to Cut a Third and Automate the Rest.
We work inside that mandate rather than arguing with it. Lower run-rate on quality, evidence your sponsor will accept, and capacity that can come back fast when the cut goes too deep.
-
The MandateReduce headcount, raise AI adoption, and prove productivity on a dashboard.
-
The RiskQuality drops and escaped defects rise right when the metrics are being watched most closely.
-
Our RoleAbsorb the verification work the cut removed, at a run-rate the model can carry.
What we do differently here
Four Moves That Fit a Cost Mandate.
1. Convert Seats Into Agents
We build your QA automation agents, then keep them tuned as the code moves. A retainer instead of a headcount line, without losing the institutional knowledge a ramp-down destroys.
2. Raise Adoption on Both Sides
Agent and prompting enablement for your remaining engineers as well as ours, aimed at the adoption metric your sponsor is grading. If the bar exists, we help your people clear it too.
3. Carry Transition Risk
Flexible notice, phased ramp-down, and a warm bench so overcut capacity returns in weeks rather than quarters. Tell us the budget number, and we build to it.
4. Evidence Your Sponsor Accepts
Per-engineer productivity and adoption reported into your own dashboard, so the diligence question has an answer that is not a slide.
Direct
If You Have a Number You Have to Hit, Lead With It.
The fastest conversation we have is with a leader who opens with the target rather than a requirements document. We will tell you plainly whether it is reachable and when it is not.